🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive policy to prohibit social platforms access for young people below 16 is sending ripples internationally. Politicians, campaigners, and guardians are observing with great interest to see if this approach will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Trend

In Europe, a rising number of nations are moving toward parallel measures.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister stating that phones and platforms are "taking away our children's innocence". The policy could be passed next year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to introduce a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to shield children from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to confirm the age and identity of social media users. Officials have stated that an similar ban is "one of the measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has asked lawmakers to enact a law lifting the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has endorsed a similar move, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The administration in the Netherlands has recommended families to restrict their children from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has adopted a advisory statement demanding a ban for under-16s except if guardian approval is provided. Although it warns of the "habit-forming" design of these services, the resolution does not create binding law.

"A clear age limit is a good foundation," commented the European lawmaker supporting the resolution.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Eye

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has kept open a future ban, emphasizing that "no measure is being dismissed" but insisting any decision must be "supported by robust research".

Previously, momentum gathered behind a proposal to enact restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately watered down. However, the government vowed to further research the issue.

Campaign organizations have voiced apprehensions. An organization founded by the relatives of a young person who took her own life after viewing dangerous social media material contends that a simple age ban could fail to improve online safety and could create a "cliff edge" of harm when users turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a response to the failure of the Silicon Valley to design products and services that are secure and suitable for minors," said a influential online safety campaigner.

America: A Decentralized Approach

Across America, legislation is largely occurring at the local government level against a backdrop of national stalemate.

• The state of Utah mandates parental consent for minors to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has passed a bill banning those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a law limiting under-16s to one hour of social media access per day, with extra access requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced laws demanding parental consent for teenagers to create social media profiles.

Even with cross-party agreement and suggestions from various figures to copy Australia's path, a US-wide ban is right now seen as improbable.

Global Perspectives

Apart from the West, further nations are likewise taking action.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, world agencies strike a more nuanced stance. A major UN agency has cautioned that social media bans pose dangers and "could have unintended consequences". The agency highlights that the internet can be a "vital connection" for marginalized children and that bans should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to prioritize user protection.

While this global discussion continues, the policies of Australia and its followers show that governments internationally are less and less prepared to stand by for the industry to act voluntarily.